Goals
2 | Charleston Battery | 25 | |
3 | Indy Eleven | 17 | |
4 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 17 | |
5 | Sacramento Republic | 16 |
Goals
2 | Charleston Battery | 25 | |
3 | Indy Eleven | 17 | |
4 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 17 | |
5 | Sacramento Republic | 16 |
Expected Goals (xG)
2 | Louisville City | 17.98 | |
3 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 17.53 | |
4 | Monterey Bay | 16.22 | |
5 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds SC | 16.18 |
Expected Goals (xG)
2 | Louisville City | 17.98 | |
3 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 17.53 | |
4 | Monterey Bay | 16.22 | |
5 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds SC | 16.18 |
Shots
2 | Louisville City | 131 | |
3 | Sacramento Republic | 131 | |
4 | Memphis 901 | 129 | |
5 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 129 |
Shots
2 | Louisville City | 131 | |
3 | Sacramento Republic | 131 | |
4 | Memphis 901 | 129 | |
5 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 129 |
Shots on target
2 | New Mexico United | 50 | |
3 | Louisville City | 49 | |
4 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 48 | |
5 | Phoenix Rising | 46 |
Shots on target
2 | New Mexico United | 50 | |
3 | Louisville City | 49 | |
4 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 48 | |
5 | Phoenix Rising | 46 |
Shot accuracy (%)
2 | El Paso Locomotive | 42.9 | |
3 | Charleston Battery | 41.5 | |
4 | The Miami FC | 38.6 | |
5 | Phoenix Rising | 38.0 |
Shot accuracy (%)
2 | El Paso Locomotive | 42.9 | |
3 | Charleston Battery | 41.5 | |
4 | The Miami FC | 38.6 | |
5 | Phoenix Rising | 38.0 |
Goal Conversion (%)
2 | Charleston Battery | 15.24 | |
3 | Orange County SC | 14.86 | |
4 | FC Tulsa | 13.54 | |
5 | The Miami FC | 13.25 |
Goal Conversion (%)
2 | Charleston Battery | 15.24 | |
3 | Orange County SC | 14.86 | |
4 | FC Tulsa | 13.54 | |
5 | The Miami FC | 13.25 |
Goals Conceded
2 | Louisville City | 7 | |
3 | Charleston Battery | 7 | |
4 | Sacramento Republic | 8 | |
5 | Orange County SC | 9 |
Goals Conceded
2 | Louisville City | 7 | |
3 | Charleston Battery | 7 | |
4 | Sacramento Republic | 8 | |
5 | Orange County SC | 9 |
xG Against
2 | Detroit City FC | 8.64 | |
3 | Louisville City | 9.12 | |
4 | Charleston Battery | 9.75 | |
5 | Sacramento Republic | 10.01 |
xG Against
2 | Detroit City FC | 8.64 | |
3 | Louisville City | 9.12 | |
4 | Charleston Battery | 9.75 | |
5 | Sacramento Republic | 10.01 |
Shots Conceded
2 | North Carolina FC | 80 | |
3 | Louisville City | 81 | |
4 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds SC | 82 | |
5 | Sacramento Republic | 90 |
Shots Conceded
2 | North Carolina FC | 80 | |
3 | Louisville City | 81 | |
4 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds SC | 82 | |
5 | Sacramento Republic | 90 |
On-Target Shots Conceded
2 | Detroit City FC | 27 | |
3 | Sacramento Republic | 27 | |
4 | Charleston Battery | 28 | |
5 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds SC | 31 |
On-Target Shots Conceded
2 | Detroit City FC | 27 | |
3 | Sacramento Republic | 27 | |
4 | Charleston Battery | 28 | |
5 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds SC | 31 |
Saves made
2 | Oakland Roots | 33 | |
3 | El Paso Locomotive | 33 | |
4 | Las Vegas Lights FC | 32 | |
5 | Monterey Bay | 32 |
Saves made
2 | Oakland Roots | 33 | |
3 | El Paso Locomotive | 33 | |
4 | Las Vegas Lights FC | 32 | |
5 | Monterey Bay | 32 |
Save ratio (%)
2 | Orange County SC | 75.68 | |
3 | Monterey Bay | 72.73 | |
4 | Colorado Springs Switchbacks | 72.22 | |
5 | Detroit City FC | 72.00 |
Save ratio (%)
2 | Orange County SC | 75.68 | |
3 | Monterey Bay | 72.73 | |
4 | Colorado Springs Switchbacks | 72.22 | |
5 | Detroit City FC | 72.00 |
Build-up Disruption % (BDP)
2 | Rhode Island | ||
3 | Las Vegas Lights FC | ||
4 | Charleston Battery | ||
5 | Indy Eleven |
Build-up Disruption % (BDP)
2 | Rhode Island | ||
3 | Las Vegas Lights FC | ||
4 | Charleston Battery | ||
5 | Indy Eleven |
Gegenpressing Int % (GPI)
2 | Rhode Island | ||
3 | Las Vegas Lights FC | ||
4 | Hartford Athletic | ||
5 | Indy Eleven |
Gegenpressing Int % (GPI)
2 | Rhode Island | ||
3 | Las Vegas Lights FC | ||
4 | Hartford Athletic | ||
5 | Indy Eleven |
Field Tilt (%)
2 | Rhode Island | ||
3 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | ||
4 | Indy Eleven | ||
5 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds SC |
Field Tilt (%)
2 | Rhode Island | ||
3 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | ||
4 | Indy Eleven | ||
5 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds SC |
Touches in Opp. Box
2 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds SC | 231 | |
3 | Sacramento Republic | 227 | |
4 | San Antonio | 222 | |
5 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 219 |
Touches in Opp. Box
2 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds SC | 231 | |
3 | Sacramento Republic | 227 | |
4 | San Antonio | 222 | |
5 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 219 |
Touches conceded in box
2 | Louisville City | 113 | |
3 | North Carolina FC | 132 | |
4 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 145 | |
5 | Charleston Battery | 146 |
Touches conceded in box
2 | Louisville City | 113 | |
3 | North Carolina FC | 132 | |
4 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 145 | |
5 | Charleston Battery | 146 |
One-Twos
2 | Charleston Battery | 33 | |
3 | Sacramento Republic | 31 | |
4 | Rhode Island | 28 | |
5 | San Antonio | 27 |
One-Twos
2 | Charleston Battery | 33 | |
3 | Sacramento Republic | 31 | |
4 | Rhode Island | 28 | |
5 | San Antonio | 27 |
Total passes
2 | Sacramento Republic | 4744 | |
3 | Phoenix Rising | 4605 | |
4 | Las Vegas Lights FC | 4537 | |
5 | Loudoun United | 4522 |
Total passes
2 | Sacramento Republic | 4744 | |
3 | Phoenix Rising | 4605 | |
4 | Las Vegas Lights FC | 4537 | |
5 | Loudoun United | 4522 |
Pass accuracy (%)
2 | Birmingham Legion | 82.9 | |
3 | Sacramento Republic | 81.6 | |
4 | Charleston Battery | 80.8 | |
5 | Las Vegas Lights FC | 80.6 |
Pass accuracy (%)
2 | Birmingham Legion | 82.9 | |
3 | Sacramento Republic | 81.6 | |
4 | Charleston Battery | 80.8 | |
5 | Las Vegas Lights FC | 80.6 |
Possession %
2 | San Antonio | 56.00 | |
3 | Las Vegas Lights FC | 55.00 | |
4 | Detroit City FC | 53.00 | |
5 | Sacramento Republic | 53.00 |
Possession %
2 | San Antonio | 56.00 | |
3 | Las Vegas Lights FC | 55.00 | |
4 | Detroit City FC | 53.00 | |
5 | Sacramento Republic | 53.00 |
Successful dribbles
2 | Phoenix Rising | 89 | |
3 | Colorado Springs Switchbacks | 80 | |
4 | Charleston Battery | 77 | |
5 | North Carolina FC | 76 |
Successful dribbles
2 | Phoenix Rising | 89 | |
3 | Colorado Springs Switchbacks | 80 | |
4 | Charleston Battery | 77 | |
5 | North Carolina FC | 76 |
Successful crosses
2 | Las Vegas Lights FC | 34 | |
3 | San Antonio | 33 | |
4 | Indy Eleven | 32 | |
5 | Loudoun United | 30 |
Successful crosses
2 | Las Vegas Lights FC | 34 | |
3 | San Antonio | 33 | |
4 | Indy Eleven | 32 | |
5 | Loudoun United | 30 |
Aerials won
2 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds SC | 178 | |
3 | Indy Eleven | 177 | |
4 | Sacramento Republic | 177 | |
5 | Monterey Bay | 169 |
Aerials won
2 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds SC | 178 | |
3 | Indy Eleven | 177 | |
4 | Sacramento Republic | 177 | |
5 | Monterey Bay | 169 |
Interceptions
2 | Oakland Roots | 109 | |
3 | Charleston Battery | 108 | |
4 | Sacramento Republic | 105 | |
5 | Memphis 901 | 101 |
Interceptions
2 | Oakland Roots | 109 | |
3 | Charleston Battery | 108 | |
4 | Sacramento Republic | 105 | |
5 | Memphis 901 | 101 |
Tackles won
2 | El Paso Locomotive | 125 | |
3 | Monterey Bay | 119 | |
4 | Rhode Island | 118 | |
5 | Oakland Roots | 109 |
Tackles won
2 | El Paso Locomotive | 125 | |
3 | Monterey Bay | 119 | |
4 | Rhode Island | 118 | |
5 | Oakland Roots | 109 |
Fouls won
2 | Oakland Roots | 156 | |
3 | Las Vegas Lights FC | 148 | |
4 | Sacramento Republic | 143 | |
5 | Loudoun United | 140 |
Fouls won
2 | Oakland Roots | 156 | |
3 | Las Vegas Lights FC | 148 | |
4 | Sacramento Republic | 143 | |
5 | Loudoun United | 140 |
Fouls conceded
2 | Indy Eleven | 165 | |
3 | North Carolina FC | 156 | |
4 | Charleston Battery | 152 | |
5 | Las Vegas Lights FC | 148 |
Fouls conceded
2 | Indy Eleven | 165 | |
3 | North Carolina FC | 156 | |
4 | Charleston Battery | 152 | |
5 | Las Vegas Lights FC | 148 |
Yellow cards
2 | San Antonio | 32 | |
3 | The Miami FC | 31 | |
4 | Phoenix Rising | 31 | |
5 | El Paso Locomotive | 30 |
Yellow cards
2 | San Antonio | 32 | |
3 | The Miami FC | 31 | |
4 | Phoenix Rising | 31 | |
5 | El Paso Locomotive | 30 |
Red cards
2 | Memphis 901 | 2 | |
3 | Monterey Bay | 2 | |
4 | Colorado Springs Switchbacks | 2 | |
5 | Las Vegas Lights FC | 1 |
Red cards
2 | Memphis 901 | 2 | |
3 | Monterey Bay | 2 | |
4 | Colorado Springs Switchbacks | 2 | |
5 | Las Vegas Lights FC | 1 |
Goals
2 | Charleston Battery | 25 | |
3 | Indy Eleven | 17 | |
4 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 17 | |
5 | Sacramento Republic | 16 |
Goals
2 | Charleston Battery | 25 | |
3 | Indy Eleven | 17 | |
4 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 17 | |
5 | Sacramento Republic | 16 |
Expected Goals (xG)
2 | Louisville City | 17.98 | |
3 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 17.53 | |
4 | Monterey Bay | 16.22 | |
5 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds SC | 16.18 |
Expected Goals (xG)
2 | Louisville City | 17.98 | |
3 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 17.53 | |
4 | Monterey Bay | 16.22 | |
5 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds SC | 16.18 |
Shots
2 | Louisville City | 131 | |
3 | Sacramento Republic | 131 | |
4 | Memphis 901 | 129 | |
5 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 129 |
Shots
2 | Louisville City | 131 | |
3 | Sacramento Republic | 131 | |
4 | Memphis 901 | 129 | |
5 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 129 |
Shots on target
2 | New Mexico United | 50 | |
3 | Louisville City | 49 | |
4 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 48 | |
5 | Phoenix Rising | 46 |
Shots on target
2 | New Mexico United | 50 | |
3 | Louisville City | 49 | |
4 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 48 | |
5 | Phoenix Rising | 46 |
Shot accuracy (%)
2 | El Paso Locomotive | 42.9 | |
3 | Charleston Battery | 41.5 | |
4 | The Miami FC | 38.6 | |
5 | Phoenix Rising | 38.0 |
Shot accuracy (%)
2 | El Paso Locomotive | 42.9 | |
3 | Charleston Battery | 41.5 | |
4 | The Miami FC | 38.6 | |
5 | Phoenix Rising | 38.0 |
Goal Conversion (%)
2 | Charleston Battery | 15.24 | |
3 | Orange County SC | 14.86 | |
4 | FC Tulsa | 13.54 | |
5 | The Miami FC | 13.25 |
Goal Conversion (%)
2 | Charleston Battery | 15.24 | |
3 | Orange County SC | 14.86 | |
4 | FC Tulsa | 13.54 | |
5 | The Miami FC | 13.25 |
Goals Conceded
2 | Louisville City | 7 | |
3 | Charleston Battery | 7 | |
4 | Sacramento Republic | 8 | |
5 | Orange County SC | 9 |
Goals Conceded
2 | Louisville City | 7 | |
3 | Charleston Battery | 7 | |
4 | Sacramento Republic | 8 | |
5 | Orange County SC | 9 |
xG Against
2 | Detroit City FC | 8.64 | |
3 | Louisville City | 9.12 | |
4 | Charleston Battery | 9.75 | |
5 | Sacramento Republic | 10.01 |
xG Against
2 | Detroit City FC | 8.64 | |
3 | Louisville City | 9.12 | |
4 | Charleston Battery | 9.75 | |
5 | Sacramento Republic | 10.01 |
Shots Conceded
2 | North Carolina FC | 80 | |
3 | Louisville City | 81 | |
4 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds SC | 82 | |
5 | Sacramento Republic | 90 |
Shots Conceded
2 | North Carolina FC | 80 | |
3 | Louisville City | 81 | |
4 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds SC | 82 | |
5 | Sacramento Republic | 90 |
On-Target Shots Conceded
2 | Detroit City FC | 27 | |
3 | Sacramento Republic | 27 | |
4 | Charleston Battery | 28 | |
5 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds SC | 31 |
On-Target Shots Conceded
2 | Detroit City FC | 27 | |
3 | Sacramento Republic | 27 | |
4 | Charleston Battery | 28 | |
5 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds SC | 31 |
Saves made
2 | Oakland Roots | 33 | |
3 | El Paso Locomotive | 33 | |
4 | Las Vegas Lights FC | 32 | |
5 | Monterey Bay | 32 |
Saves made
2 | Oakland Roots | 33 | |
3 | El Paso Locomotive | 33 | |
4 | Las Vegas Lights FC | 32 | |
5 | Monterey Bay | 32 |
Save ratio (%)
2 | Orange County SC | 75.68 | |
3 | Monterey Bay | 72.73 | |
4 | Colorado Springs Switchbacks | 72.22 | |
5 | Detroit City FC | 72.00 |
Save ratio (%)
2 | Orange County SC | 75.68 | |
3 | Monterey Bay | 72.73 | |
4 | Colorado Springs Switchbacks | 72.22 | |
5 | Detroit City FC | 72.00 |
Build-up Disruption % (BDP)
2 | Rhode Island | ||
3 | Las Vegas Lights FC | ||
4 | Charleston Battery | ||
5 | Indy Eleven |
Build-up Disruption % (BDP)
2 | Rhode Island | ||
3 | Las Vegas Lights FC | ||
4 | Charleston Battery | ||
5 | Indy Eleven |
Gegenpressing Int % (GPI)
2 | Rhode Island | ||
3 | Las Vegas Lights FC | ||
4 | Hartford Athletic | ||
5 | Indy Eleven |
Gegenpressing Int % (GPI)
2 | Rhode Island | ||
3 | Las Vegas Lights FC | ||
4 | Hartford Athletic | ||
5 | Indy Eleven |
Field Tilt (%)
2 | Rhode Island | ||
3 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | ||
4 | Indy Eleven | ||
5 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds SC |
Field Tilt (%)
2 | Rhode Island | ||
3 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | ||
4 | Indy Eleven | ||
5 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds SC |
Touches in Opp. Box
2 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds SC | 231 | |
3 | Sacramento Republic | 227 | |
4 | San Antonio | 222 | |
5 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 219 |
Touches in Opp. Box
2 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds SC | 231 | |
3 | Sacramento Republic | 227 | |
4 | San Antonio | 222 | |
5 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 219 |
Touches conceded in box
2 | Louisville City | 113 | |
3 | North Carolina FC | 132 | |
4 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 145 | |
5 | Charleston Battery | 146 |
Touches conceded in box
2 | Louisville City | 113 | |
3 | North Carolina FC | 132 | |
4 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 145 | |
5 | Charleston Battery | 146 |
One-Twos
2 | Charleston Battery | 33 | |
3 | Sacramento Republic | 31 | |
4 | Rhode Island | 28 | |
5 | San Antonio | 27 |
One-Twos
2 | Charleston Battery | 33 | |
3 | Sacramento Republic | 31 | |
4 | Rhode Island | 28 | |
5 | San Antonio | 27 |
Total passes
2 | Sacramento Republic | 4744 | |
3 | Phoenix Rising | 4605 | |
4 | Las Vegas Lights FC | 4537 | |
5 | Loudoun United | 4522 |
Total passes
2 | Sacramento Republic | 4744 | |
3 | Phoenix Rising | 4605 | |
4 | Las Vegas Lights FC | 4537 | |
5 | Loudoun United | 4522 |
Pass accuracy (%)
2 | Birmingham Legion | 82.9 | |
3 | Sacramento Republic | 81.6 | |
4 | Charleston Battery | 80.8 | |
5 | Las Vegas Lights FC | 80.6 |
Pass accuracy (%)
2 | Birmingham Legion | 82.9 | |
3 | Sacramento Republic | 81.6 | |
4 | Charleston Battery | 80.8 | |
5 | Las Vegas Lights FC | 80.6 |
Possession %
2 | San Antonio | 56.00 | |
3 | Las Vegas Lights FC | 55.00 | |
4 | Detroit City FC | 53.00 | |
5 | Sacramento Republic | 53.00 |
Possession %
2 | San Antonio | 56.00 | |
3 | Las Vegas Lights FC | 55.00 | |
4 | Detroit City FC | 53.00 | |
5 | Sacramento Republic | 53.00 |
Successful dribbles
2 | Phoenix Rising | 89 | |
3 | Colorado Springs Switchbacks | 80 | |
4 | Charleston Battery | 77 | |
5 | North Carolina FC | 76 |
Successful dribbles
2 | Phoenix Rising | 89 | |
3 | Colorado Springs Switchbacks | 80 | |
4 | Charleston Battery | 77 | |
5 | North Carolina FC | 76 |
Successful crosses
2 | Las Vegas Lights FC | 34 | |
3 | San Antonio | 33 | |
4 | Indy Eleven | 32 | |
5 | Loudoun United | 30 |
Successful crosses
2 | Las Vegas Lights FC | 34 | |
3 | San Antonio | 33 | |
4 | Indy Eleven | 32 | |
5 | Loudoun United | 30 |
Aerials won
2 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds SC | 178 | |
3 | Indy Eleven | 177 | |
4 | Sacramento Republic | 177 | |
5 | Monterey Bay | 169 |
Aerials won
2 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds SC | 178 | |
3 | Indy Eleven | 177 | |
4 | Sacramento Republic | 177 | |
5 | Monterey Bay | 169 |
Interceptions
2 | Oakland Roots | 109 | |
3 | Charleston Battery | 108 | |
4 | Sacramento Republic | 105 | |
5 | Memphis 901 | 101 |
Interceptions
2 | Oakland Roots | 109 | |
3 | Charleston Battery | 108 | |
4 | Sacramento Republic | 105 | |
5 | Memphis 901 | 101 |
Tackles won
2 | El Paso Locomotive | 125 | |
3 | Monterey Bay | 119 | |
4 | Rhode Island | 118 | |
5 | Oakland Roots | 109 |
Tackles won
2 | El Paso Locomotive | 125 | |
3 | Monterey Bay | 119 | |
4 | Rhode Island | 118 | |
5 | Oakland Roots | 109 |
Fouls won
2 | Oakland Roots | 156 | |
3 | Las Vegas Lights FC | 148 | |
4 | Sacramento Republic | 143 | |
5 | Loudoun United | 140 |
Fouls won
2 | Oakland Roots | 156 | |
3 | Las Vegas Lights FC | 148 | |
4 | Sacramento Republic | 143 | |
5 | Loudoun United | 140 |
Fouls conceded
2 | Indy Eleven | 165 | |
3 | North Carolina FC | 156 | |
4 | Charleston Battery | 152 | |
5 | Las Vegas Lights FC | 148 |
Fouls conceded
2 | Indy Eleven | 165 | |
3 | North Carolina FC | 156 | |
4 | Charleston Battery | 152 | |
5 | Las Vegas Lights FC | 148 |
Yellow cards
2 | San Antonio | 32 | |
3 | The Miami FC | 31 | |
4 | Phoenix Rising | 31 | |
5 | El Paso Locomotive | 30 |
Yellow cards
2 | San Antonio | 32 | |
3 | The Miami FC | 31 | |
4 | Phoenix Rising | 31 | |
5 | El Paso Locomotive | 30 |
Red cards
2 | Memphis 901 | 2 | |
3 | Monterey Bay | 2 | |
4 | Colorado Springs Switchbacks | 2 | |
5 | Las Vegas Lights FC | 1 |
Red cards
2 | Memphis 901 | 2 | |
3 | Monterey Bay | 2 | |
4 | Colorado Springs Switchbacks | 2 | |
5 | Las Vegas Lights FC | 1 |