X
X
X
X
X
All leagues
Hungarian Liga NB I
Hungary
44.0
% League imbalance
3.06
Goals per match
0.10
Non-penalty xG per shot
27.3
Average age
6.7
% minutes played by U21

Expected Goals (xG)

2 Puskás 55.08
3 Diósgyör 50.57
4 Paks 48.79
5 Újpest 47.36

Expected Goals (xG)

2 Puskás 55.08
3 Diósgyör 50.57
4 Paks 48.79
5 Újpest 47.36

Shots on target

2 Puskás 170
3 Fehérvár 161
4 Paks 159
5 Diósgyör 152

Shots on target

2 Puskás 170
3 Fehérvár 161
4 Paks 159
5 Diósgyör 152

Shot accuracy (%)

2 Zalaegerszeg 36.3
3 Ferencvárosi TC 35.5
4 Diósgyör 35.4
5 Paks 35.1

Shot accuracy (%)

2 Zalaegerszeg 36.3
3 Ferencvárosi TC 35.5
4 Diósgyör 35.4
5 Paks 35.1

Goal Conversion (%)

2 Zalaegerszeg 12.53
3 Fehérvár 12.47
4 Diósgyör 11.42
5 Puskás 11.13

Goal Conversion (%)

2 Zalaegerszeg 12.53
3 Fehérvár 12.47
4 Diósgyör 11.42
5 Puskás 11.13

xG Against

2 Diósgyör 38.16
3 Debrecen 39.27
4 Puskás 39.31
5 MTK 45.52

xG Against

2 Diósgyör 38.16
3 Debrecen 39.27
4 Puskás 39.31
5 MTK 45.52

Shots Conceded

2 Puskás 363
3 Debrecen 373
4 Kecskemét 384
5 Paks 397

Shots Conceded

2 Puskás 363
3 Debrecen 373
4 Kecskemét 384
5 Paks 397

On-Target Shots Conceded

2 Puskás 121
3 Kecskemét 125
4 Debrecen 140
5 Paks 145

On-Target Shots Conceded

2 Puskás 121
3 Kecskemét 125
4 Debrecen 140
5 Paks 145

Save ratio (%)

2 Ferencvárosi TC 73.68
3 Puskás 72.13
4 Paks 70.50
5 Kisvárda 69.71

Save ratio (%)

2 Ferencvárosi TC 73.68
3 Puskás 72.13
4 Paks 70.50
5 Kisvárda 69.71

Build-up Disruption % (BDP)

Paks
6.75
2 Ferencvárosi TC Subscription needed
3 Debrecen Subscription needed
4 Kecskemét Subscription needed
5 Puskás Subscription needed

Build-up Disruption % (BDP)

Paks
6.75
2 Ferencvárosi TC Subscription needed
3 Debrecen Subscription needed
4 Kecskemét Subscription needed
5 Puskás Subscription needed

Gegenpressing Int % (GPI)

2 Kecskemét Subscription needed
3 Debrecen Subscription needed
4 Puskás Subscription needed
5 Paks Subscription needed

Gegenpressing Int % (GPI)

2 Kecskemét Subscription needed
3 Debrecen Subscription needed
4 Puskás Subscription needed
5 Paks Subscription needed

Field Tilt (%)

2 Paks Subscription needed
3 Debrecen Subscription needed
4 Kecskemét Subscription needed
5 Diósgyör Subscription needed

Field Tilt (%)

2 Paks Subscription needed
3 Debrecen Subscription needed
4 Kecskemét Subscription needed
5 Diósgyör Subscription needed

Touches in Opp. Box

2 Puskás 865
3 Paks 817
4 Diósgyör 774
5 Debrecen 743

Touches in Opp. Box

2 Puskás 865
3 Paks 817
4 Diósgyör 774
5 Debrecen 743

Touches conceded in box

2 Puskás 602
3 Debrecen 618
4 Kecskemét 674
5 Paks 702

Touches conceded in box

2 Puskás 602
3 Debrecen 618
4 Kecskemét 674
5 Paks 702

Total passes

2 Debrecen 15062
3 Diósgyör 14712
4 Újpest 14204
5 Fehérvár 14029

Total passes

2 Debrecen 15062
3 Diósgyör 14712
4 Újpest 14204
5 Fehérvár 14029

Pass accuracy (%)

2 Debrecen 81.5
3 Fehérvár 80.5
4 Diósgyör 80.3
5 Újpest 79.4

Pass accuracy (%)

2 Debrecen 81.5
3 Fehérvár 80.5
4 Diósgyör 80.3
5 Újpest 79.4

Possession %

2 Debrecen 57.00
3 Diósgyör 53.00
4 Újpest 52.00
5 Fehérvár 51.00

Possession %

2 Debrecen 57.00
3 Diósgyör 53.00
4 Újpest 52.00
5 Fehérvár 51.00

Successful crosses

2 Ferencvárosi TC 131
3 Paks 128
4 Debrecen 122
5 Diósgyör 101

Successful crosses

2 Ferencvárosi TC 131
3 Paks 128
4 Debrecen 122
5 Diósgyör 101

Aerials won

Paks
682
2 Kecskemét 679
3 Puskás 652
4 Újpest 609
5 Kisvárda 608

Aerials won

Paks
682
2 Kecskemét 679
3 Puskás 652
4 Újpest 609
5 Kisvárda 608

PPDA

2 Debrecen Subscription needed
3 Paks Subscription needed
4 Puskás Subscription needed
5 Kecskemét Subscription needed

PPDA

2 Debrecen Subscription needed
3 Paks Subscription needed
4 Puskás Subscription needed
5 Kecskemét Subscription needed

Interceptions

MTK
380
2 Paks 353
3 Mezokovesd 353
4 Kecskemét 350
5 Debrecen 343

Interceptions

MTK
380
2 Paks 353
3 Mezokovesd 353
4 Kecskemét 350
5 Debrecen 343

Fouls conceded

2 Kecskemét 501
3 Paks 465
4 Debrecen 409
5 Ferencvárosi TC 405

Fouls conceded

2 Kecskemét 501
3 Paks 465
4 Debrecen 409
5 Ferencvárosi TC 405
All leagues
Hungarian Liga NB I
Hungary
44.0
% League imbalance
3.06
Goals per match
0.10
Non-penalty xG per shot
27.3
Average age
6.7
% Minutes played by U21

Expected Goals (xG)

2 Puskás 55.08
3 Diósgyör 50.57
4 Paks 48.79
5 Újpest 47.36

Expected Goals (xG)

2 Puskás 55.08
3 Diósgyör 50.57
4 Paks 48.79
5 Újpest 47.36

Shots on target

2 Puskás 170
3 Fehérvár 161
4 Paks 159
5 Diósgyör 152

Shots on target

2 Puskás 170
3 Fehérvár 161
4 Paks 159
5 Diósgyör 152

Shot accuracy (%)

2 Zalaegerszeg 36.3
3 Ferencvárosi TC 35.5
4 Diósgyör 35.4
5 Paks 35.1

Shot accuracy (%)

2 Zalaegerszeg 36.3
3 Ferencvárosi TC 35.5
4 Diósgyör 35.4
5 Paks 35.1

Goal Conversion (%)

2 Zalaegerszeg 12.53
3 Fehérvár 12.47
4 Diósgyör 11.42
5 Puskás 11.13

Goal Conversion (%)

2 Zalaegerszeg 12.53
3 Fehérvár 12.47
4 Diósgyör 11.42
5 Puskás 11.13

xG Against

2 Diósgyör 38.16
3 Debrecen 39.27
4 Puskás 39.31
5 MTK 45.52

xG Against

2 Diósgyör 38.16
3 Debrecen 39.27
4 Puskás 39.31
5 MTK 45.52

Shots Conceded

2 Puskás 363
3 Debrecen 373
4 Kecskemét 384
5 Paks 397

Shots Conceded

2 Puskás 363
3 Debrecen 373
4 Kecskemét 384
5 Paks 397

On-Target Shots Conceded

2 Puskás 121
3 Kecskemét 125
4 Debrecen 140
5 Paks 145

On-Target Shots Conceded

2 Puskás 121
3 Kecskemét 125
4 Debrecen 140
5 Paks 145

Save ratio (%)

2 Ferencvárosi TC 73.68
3 Puskás 72.13
4 Paks 70.50
5 Kisvárda 69.71

Save ratio (%)

2 Ferencvárosi TC 73.68
3 Puskás 72.13
4 Paks 70.50
5 Kisvárda 69.71

Build-up Disruption % (BDP)

Paks
6.75
2 Ferencvárosi TC Subscription needed
3 Debrecen Subscription needed
4 Kecskemét Subscription needed
5 Puskás Subscription needed

Build-up Disruption % (BDP)

Paks
6.75
2 Ferencvárosi TC Subscription needed
3 Debrecen Subscription needed
4 Kecskemét Subscription needed
5 Puskás Subscription needed

Gegenpressing Int % (GPI)

2 Kecskemét Subscription needed
3 Debrecen Subscription needed
4 Puskás Subscription needed
5 Paks Subscription needed

Gegenpressing Int % (GPI)

2 Kecskemét Subscription needed
3 Debrecen Subscription needed
4 Puskás Subscription needed
5 Paks Subscription needed

Field Tilt (%)

2 Paks Subscription needed
3 Debrecen Subscription needed
4 Kecskemét Subscription needed
5 Diósgyör Subscription needed

Field Tilt (%)

2 Paks Subscription needed
3 Debrecen Subscription needed
4 Kecskemét Subscription needed
5 Diósgyör Subscription needed

Touches in Opp. Box

2 Puskás 865
3 Paks 817
4 Diósgyör 774
5 Debrecen 743

Touches in Opp. Box

2 Puskás 865
3 Paks 817
4 Diósgyör 774
5 Debrecen 743

Touches conceded in box

2 Puskás 602
3 Debrecen 618
4 Kecskemét 674
5 Paks 702

Touches conceded in box

2 Puskás 602
3 Debrecen 618
4 Kecskemét 674
5 Paks 702

Total passes

2 Debrecen 15062
3 Diósgyör 14712
4 Újpest 14204
5 Fehérvár 14029

Total passes

2 Debrecen 15062
3 Diósgyör 14712
4 Újpest 14204
5 Fehérvár 14029

Pass accuracy (%)

2 Debrecen 81.5
3 Fehérvár 80.5
4 Diósgyör 80.3
5 Újpest 79.4

Pass accuracy (%)

2 Debrecen 81.5
3 Fehérvár 80.5
4 Diósgyör 80.3
5 Újpest 79.4

Possession %

2 Debrecen 57.00
3 Diósgyör 53.00
4 Újpest 52.00
5 Fehérvár 51.00

Possession %

2 Debrecen 57.00
3 Diósgyör 53.00
4 Újpest 52.00
5 Fehérvár 51.00

Successful crosses

2 Ferencvárosi TC 131
3 Paks 128
4 Debrecen 122
5 Diósgyör 101

Successful crosses

2 Ferencvárosi TC 131
3 Paks 128
4 Debrecen 122
5 Diósgyör 101

Aerials won

Paks
682
2 Kecskemét 679
3 Puskás 652
4 Újpest 609
5 Kisvárda 608

Aerials won

Paks
682
2 Kecskemét 679
3 Puskás 652
4 Újpest 609
5 Kisvárda 608

PPDA

2 Debrecen Subscription needed
3 Paks Subscription needed
4 Puskás Subscription needed
5 Kecskemét Subscription needed

PPDA

2 Debrecen Subscription needed
3 Paks Subscription needed
4 Puskás Subscription needed
5 Kecskemét Subscription needed

Interceptions

MTK
380
2 Paks 353
3 Mezokovesd 353
4 Kecskemét 350
5 Debrecen 343

Interceptions

MTK
380
2 Paks 353
3 Mezokovesd 353
4 Kecskemét 350
5 Debrecen 343

Fouls conceded

2 Kecskemét 501
3 Paks 465
4 Debrecen 409
5 Ferencvárosi TC 405

Fouls conceded

2 Kecskemét 501
3 Paks 465
4 Debrecen 409
5 Ferencvárosi TC 405