All leagues
Brazilian Serie A
Brazil
39.0
% League imbalance
2.49
Goals per match
0.09
Non-penalty xG per shot
28.3
Average age
5.0
% minutes played by U21

Total passes

2 Flamengo 20097
3 São Paulo 19973
4 Atlético Mineiro 17703
5 Internacional 17590
6 Corinthians 17381
7 Red Bull Bragantino 16956
8 Cruzeiro 16303
9 Palmeiras 16264
10 Bahia 15960
11 Botafogo 15783
12 Grêmio 15726
13 Vasco da Gama 15469
14 Athletico Paranaense 15221
15 Fortaleza EC 14612
16 Cuiabá 14333
17 Goiás 14057
18 Coritiba 13794
19 Santos 13689
20 América Mineiro 13663

Total passes

2 Flamengo 20097
3 São Paulo 19973
4 Atlético Mineiro 17703
5 Internacional 17590
6 Corinthians 17381
7 Red Bull Bragantino 16956
8 Cruzeiro 16303
9 Palmeiras 16264
10 Bahia 15960
11 Botafogo 15783
12 Grêmio 15726
13 Vasco da Gama 15469
14 Athletico Paranaense 15221
15 Fortaleza EC 14612
16 Cuiabá 14333
17 Goiás 14057
18 Coritiba 13794
19 Santos 13689
20 América Mineiro 13663

Expected Goals (xG)

Palmeiras
64.00
2 Red Bull Bragantino 59.09
3 Flamengo 57.33
4 Fortaleza EC 53.40
5 Athletico Paranaense 52.77

Expected Goals (xG)

2 Red Bull Bragantino 59.09
3 Flamengo 57.33
4 Fortaleza EC 53.40
5 Athletico Paranaense 52.77

Shot accuracy (%)

2 Grêmio 38.3
3 Flamengo 36.1
4 Atlético Mineiro 35.6
5 Corinthians 35.5

Shot accuracy (%)

2 Grêmio 38.3
3 Flamengo 36.1
4 Atlético Mineiro 35.6
5 Corinthians 35.5

Goal Conversion (%)

Grêmio
12.23
2 Flamengo 11.22
3 Botafogo 10.90
4 Atlético Mineiro 10.49
5 Palmeiras 10.28

Goal Conversion (%)

Grêmio
12.23
2 Flamengo 11.22
3 Botafogo 10.90
4 Atlético Mineiro 10.49
5 Palmeiras 10.28

Save ratio (%)

Botafogo
78.36
2 Palmeiras 78.00
3 Cruzeiro 77.62
4 Atlético Mineiro 77.46
5 Flamengo 76.27

Save ratio (%)

2 Palmeiras 78.00
3 Cruzeiro 77.62
4 Atlético Mineiro 77.46
5 Flamengo 76.27

Build-up Disruption % (BDP)

2 Fluminense Subscription needed
3 Cruzeiro Subscription needed
4 São Paulo Subscription needed
5 Flamengo Subscription needed

Build-up Disruption % (BDP)

2 Fluminense Subscription needed
3 Cruzeiro Subscription needed
4 São Paulo Subscription needed
5 Flamengo Subscription needed

Gegenpressing Int % (GPI)

2 Cruzeiro Subscription needed
3 Fluminense Subscription needed
4 São Paulo Subscription needed
5 Flamengo Subscription needed

Gegenpressing Int % (GPI)

2 Cruzeiro Subscription needed
3 Fluminense Subscription needed
4 São Paulo Subscription needed
5 Flamengo Subscription needed

Field Tilt (%)

2 Flamengo Subscription needed
3 Fluminense Subscription needed
4 São Paulo Subscription needed
5 Cruzeiro Subscription needed

Field Tilt (%)

2 Flamengo Subscription needed
3 Fluminense Subscription needed
4 São Paulo Subscription needed
5 Cruzeiro Subscription needed

Touches in Opp. Box

2 Red Bull Bragantino 923
3 Grêmio 846
4 Palmeiras 841
5 Fluminense 827

Touches in Opp. Box

2 Red Bull Bragantino 923
3 Grêmio 846
4 Palmeiras 841
5 Fluminense 827

Touches conceded in box

2 São Paulo 668
3 Cruzeiro 673
4 Red Bull Bragantino 689
5 Flamengo 701

Touches conceded in box

2 São Paulo 668
3 Cruzeiro 673
4 Red Bull Bragantino 689
5 Flamengo 701

Pass accuracy (%)

2 Flamengo 86.3
3 São Paulo 86.2
4 Corinthians 83.6
5 Internacional 83.6

Pass accuracy (%)

2 Flamengo 86.3
3 São Paulo 86.2
4 Corinthians 83.6
5 Internacional 83.6

PPDA

2 Fluminense Subscription needed
3 São Paulo Subscription needed
4 Atlético Mineiro Subscription needed
5 Flamengo Subscription needed

PPDA

2 Fluminense Subscription needed
3 São Paulo Subscription needed
4 Atlético Mineiro Subscription needed
5 Flamengo Subscription needed

Fouls won

2 Goiás 577
3 Cuiabá 564
4 Fluminense 560
5 Santos 549

Fouls won

2 Goiás 577
3 Cuiabá 564
4 Fluminense 560
5 Santos 549
All leagues
Brazilian Serie A
Brazil
39.0
% League imbalance
2.49
Goals per match
0.09
Non-penalty xG per shot
28.3
Average age
5.0
% Minutes played by U21

Total passes

2 Flamengo 20097
3 São Paulo 19973
4 Atlético Mineiro 17703
5 Internacional 17590
6 Corinthians 17381
7 Red Bull Bragantino 16956
8 Cruzeiro 16303
9 Palmeiras 16264
10 Bahia 15960
11 Botafogo 15783
12 Grêmio 15726
13 Vasco da Gama 15469
14 Athletico Paranaense 15221
15 Fortaleza EC 14612
16 Cuiabá 14333
17 Goiás 14057
18 Coritiba 13794
19 Santos 13689
20 América Mineiro 13663

Total passes

2 Flamengo 20097
3 São Paulo 19973
4 Atlético Mineiro 17703
5 Internacional 17590
6 Corinthians 17381
7 Red Bull Bragantino 16956
8 Cruzeiro 16303
9 Palmeiras 16264
10 Bahia 15960
11 Botafogo 15783
12 Grêmio 15726
13 Vasco da Gama 15469
14 Athletico Paranaense 15221
15 Fortaleza EC 14612
16 Cuiabá 14333
17 Goiás 14057
18 Coritiba 13794
19 Santos 13689
20 América Mineiro 13663

Expected Goals (xG)

Palmeiras
64.00
2 Red Bull Bragantino 59.09
3 Flamengo 57.33
4 Fortaleza EC 53.40
5 Athletico Paranaense 52.77

Expected Goals (xG)

2 Red Bull Bragantino 59.09
3 Flamengo 57.33
4 Fortaleza EC 53.40
5 Athletico Paranaense 52.77

Shot accuracy (%)

2 Grêmio 38.3
3 Flamengo 36.1
4 Atlético Mineiro 35.6
5 Corinthians 35.5

Shot accuracy (%)

2 Grêmio 38.3
3 Flamengo 36.1
4 Atlético Mineiro 35.6
5 Corinthians 35.5

Goal Conversion (%)

Grêmio
12.23
2 Flamengo 11.22
3 Botafogo 10.90
4 Atlético Mineiro 10.49
5 Palmeiras 10.28

Goal Conversion (%)

Grêmio
12.23
2 Flamengo 11.22
3 Botafogo 10.90
4 Atlético Mineiro 10.49
5 Palmeiras 10.28

Save ratio (%)

Botafogo
78.36
2 Palmeiras 78.00
3 Cruzeiro 77.62
4 Atlético Mineiro 77.46
5 Flamengo 76.27

Save ratio (%)

2 Palmeiras 78.00
3 Cruzeiro 77.62
4 Atlético Mineiro 77.46
5 Flamengo 76.27

Build-up Disruption % (BDP)

2 Fluminense Subscription needed
3 Cruzeiro Subscription needed
4 São Paulo Subscription needed
5 Flamengo Subscription needed

Build-up Disruption % (BDP)

2 Fluminense Subscription needed
3 Cruzeiro Subscription needed
4 São Paulo Subscription needed
5 Flamengo Subscription needed

Gegenpressing Int % (GPI)

2 Cruzeiro Subscription needed
3 Fluminense Subscription needed
4 São Paulo Subscription needed
5 Flamengo Subscription needed

Gegenpressing Int % (GPI)

2 Cruzeiro Subscription needed
3 Fluminense Subscription needed
4 São Paulo Subscription needed
5 Flamengo Subscription needed

Field Tilt (%)

2 Flamengo Subscription needed
3 Fluminense Subscription needed
4 São Paulo Subscription needed
5 Cruzeiro Subscription needed

Field Tilt (%)

2 Flamengo Subscription needed
3 Fluminense Subscription needed
4 São Paulo Subscription needed
5 Cruzeiro Subscription needed

Touches in Opp. Box

2 Red Bull Bragantino 923
3 Grêmio 846
4 Palmeiras 841
5 Fluminense 827

Touches in Opp. Box

2 Red Bull Bragantino 923
3 Grêmio 846
4 Palmeiras 841
5 Fluminense 827

Touches conceded in box

2 São Paulo 668
3 Cruzeiro 673
4 Red Bull Bragantino 689
5 Flamengo 701

Touches conceded in box

2 São Paulo 668
3 Cruzeiro 673
4 Red Bull Bragantino 689
5 Flamengo 701

Pass accuracy (%)

2 Flamengo 86.3
3 São Paulo 86.2
4 Corinthians 83.6
5 Internacional 83.6

Pass accuracy (%)

2 Flamengo 86.3
3 São Paulo 86.2
4 Corinthians 83.6
5 Internacional 83.6

PPDA

2 Fluminense Subscription needed
3 São Paulo Subscription needed
4 Atlético Mineiro Subscription needed
5 Flamengo Subscription needed

PPDA

2 Fluminense Subscription needed
3 São Paulo Subscription needed
4 Atlético Mineiro Subscription needed
5 Flamengo Subscription needed

Fouls won

2 Goiás 577
3 Cuiabá 564
4 Fluminense 560
5 Santos 549

Fouls won

2 Goiás 577
3 Cuiabá 564
4 Fluminense 560
5 Santos 549